Evaluate
Identify the indeterminate form. As both and , so the quotient is of type . That form has no automatic value — the answer depends on which part grows faster, so we need a comparison tool rather than direct substitution.
Apply L'Hopital's rule once. Treating as a continuous variable, differentiate numerator and denominator separately:
One application is enough because differentiating destroys the logarithm entirely, while the denominator stays a power.
Sanity-check the growth ordering. The result is an instance of a general fact: grows slower than for every , so always. Numerically — already essentially zero ✓.
Locate the maximum, so the decay is not mistaken for monotone decrease. With , the product rule gives
which vanishes at , i.e. . So rises up to and only then decays to . A numerical derivative matches this formula at to ✓.
Note what the limit does — and does not — imply about the series. The terms tending to is necessary but not sufficient for convergence. Here convergence does hold, by comparison: for large , , so , and is a convergent -series with .
The sum's value is ; summing the first two million terms gives ✓.
Need to solve a different problem like this? Open the solver →