In trapezoid the sides and are parallel. The leg measures , and the distance from , the midpoint of the other leg , to the line is . Find the area of the trapezoid.
Notice what is missing, and stop looking for it. Neither base length nor the height of the trapezoid is given, and they cannot be recovered — infinitely many trapezoids fit the data. So the area must be computable from and that one distance alone, which points to an area-splitting argument rather than the usual base-times-height formula.
Split the trapezoid at . Joining to and to cuts the trapezoid into three triangles: , and . Their areas add up to the whole:
Use the midpoint to fix two of the three heights. Let be the height of the trapezoid, i.e. the distance between the parallel lines and . Because is the midpoint of , with on line and on line , its distance to each of those parallel lines is . Hence
Add them and compare with the trapezoid. Summing the two outer triangles:
The two outer triangles take exactly half the trapezoid, so the middle triangle takes the other half:
Compute the middle triangle from the given data. Triangle has base and height equal to the distance from to line , which is :
Double it to get the trapezoid. Since is half the trapezoid,
A numerical check confirms this is base-independent: building trapezoids with wildly different bases and heights that still satisfy and always yields an area of .
Need to solve a different problem like this? Open the solver →