Geometry Proof Solver
Two-column proofs with every statement paired to the theorem that justifies it
How a Two-Column Proof Works
A proof is a chain in which every statement is licensed by something already true: the given, a definition, a postulate, a previously proved theorem, or an algebraic property. The two-column layout makes the licence explicit — statements on the left, reasons on the right.
The method:
- Mark the diagram with everything given. Congruent marks, right-angle boxes and shared sides are what make the next step visible.
- Work backwards from the goal. To prove two segments congruent, the usual route is to prove the triangles containing them congruent, then finish with CPCTC.
- Collect the ingredients the chosen theorem needs — SSS, SAS, ASA, AAS or HL each demand three specific parts in a specific arrangement.
- Include the free facts: a shared side is congruent to itself (Reflexive Property), and intersecting lines create congruent vertical angles.
- Write the reason for every line. A statement with no reason is a gap, not a shortcut.
The Reasons You Will Actually Use
| Reason | What it lets you write |
|---|---|
| Definition of midpoint | The midpoint splits a segment into two congruent halves |
| Definition of bisector | An angle bisector makes two congruent angles |
| Reflexive Property | — a shared side or angle |
| Vertical Angles Theorem | Opposite angles at an intersection are congruent |
| Linear Pair / Supplementary | Two adjacent angles on a line sum to |
| Alternate Interior Angles | Requires parallel lines cut by a transversal |
| Triangle Sum Theorem | The three angles of a triangle sum to |
| SSS, SAS, ASA, AAS, HL | Triangle congruence |
| CPCTC | Once triangles are congruent, any corresponding parts are |
The condition people forget: SAS needs the angle between the two sides, and ASA needs the side between the two angles. Get the arrangement wrong and you have SSA, which does not prove congruence. HL applies only to right triangles, and CPCTC may only be used after the congruence is established — never as a step towards it.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- Assuming from the picture. Segments that look equal, angles that look right and lines that look parallel prove nothing unless marked or given.
- Using SSA or AAA. Neither establishes congruence; AAA gives similarity only.
- Using CPCTC too early. It is the conclusion drawn from congruent triangles, not a reason for congruence.
- Applying parallel-line theorems without parallel lines. Alternate interior and corresponding angles need the parallel condition stated or proved first.
- Misordering the vertices. asserts , , ; a scrambled order makes CPCTC produce false claims.
- Leaving a reason blank or writing "obvious". Every line needs a named definition, postulate or theorem.
示例题目
常见问题
A two-column proof lists each statement on the left and the reason that justifies it on the right. The reasons may only be the given information, definitions, postulates, previously proved theorems, or properties of equality — every line needs one.
CPCTC — corresponding parts of congruent triangles are congruent — is used only after you have already proved the triangles congruent by SSS, SAS, ASA, AAS or HL. It is the last step of a proof, never a reason for the congruence itself.
Two sides and a non-included angle can describe two genuinely different triangles — the ambiguous case, the same one that makes the law of sines produce two answers. Only SSS, SAS, ASA, AAS and (for right triangles) HL guarantee congruence.
No. A diagram may only be used for what is marked or stated: congruence marks, right-angle boxes, parallel arrows, and betweenness of points on a line. Equal-looking lengths, right-looking angles and parallel-looking lines must be given or proved.
相关求解器
相关学习指南
免费试用 AI-Math
任何数学问题都能获得分步解答。拍照上传或输入问题即可。
开始解题