Graph Inequalities Calculator

Boundary, dashed or solid, and the shaded half-plane — decided by a test point, not a guess
y <= 2x - 1
3x + 2y > 6
-2 < 3x + 1 <= 10
y > x^2 - 4

A Solution Set You Can See

Solving an inequality gives a set of answers, and a graph is the honest way to display a set. Which picture you draw depends on how many variables are present.

  • One variable (−1<x≤3-1 < x \le 3) lives on a number line: a segment with an open circle at an excluded endpoint and a filled circle at an included one.
  • Two variables (y≤2x−1y \le 2x - 1) lives on the coordinate plane: a boundary line with one entire side shaded. Every point in the shaded region — thousands of them — satisfies the inequality.

The boundary itself carries information. A solid line means the boundary points are solutions, which happens with ≤\le and ≥\ge. A dashed line means they are not, which happens with the strict << and >>. Drawing the wrong style is the same error as writing a bracket where a parenthesis belongs.

Boundary, Style, Test Point

Three steps, always in this order.

1. Draw the boundary

Replace the inequality sign with == and graph that line. Use the intercepts, or slope-intercept form if the equation is already solved for yy.

2. Choose solid or dashed

SignBoundary
<< or >>Dashed — endpoints excluded
≤\le or ≥\geSolid — endpoints included

3. Shade using a test point

Pick any point not on the boundary — (0,0)(0,0) whenever the line misses the origin, because the arithmetic is trivial. Substitute it into the original inequality.

  • True → shade the side containing that point.
  • False → shade the other side.

This test is why you never need to remember rules like "≤\le means shade below". Those rules only hold once the inequality has been solved for yy, and they fail the moment the coefficient of yy is negative — the very case where a division flipped the sign.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • Forgetting the flip. Dividing −2y>4-2y > 4 by −2-2 gives y<−2y < -2. Miss this and you shade the wrong half of the plane.
  • Testing a point on the boundary. (0,0)(0,0) is useless for 3x+2y>03x + 2y > 0; it makes the inequality an equality. Choose (1,1)(1,1) instead.
  • Mixing up circle types. Open circle for << and >>, filled circle for ≤\le and ≥\ge.
  • Shading both sides of a system. With two inequalities the answer is only the overlap; shade lightly and outline the common region.
  • Assuming the shading is always below for ≤\le. True only after isolating yy with a positive coefficient.

Examples

Step 1: Boundary: y=2x−1y = 2x - 1, a line through (0,−1)(0, -1) with slope 22; it also passes through (1,1)(1, 1)
Step 2: The sign is ≤\le, so draw the line solid
Step 3: Test (0,0)(0, 0): is 0≤2(0)−1=−10 \le 2(0) - 1 = -1? No, that is false
Step 4: Because the test failed, shade the side that does not contain the origin — the region below and right of the line
Step 5: Confirm with (2,0)(2, 0): 0≤2(2)−1=30 \le 2(2) - 1 = 3 ✓, and (2,0)(2,0) does lie in the shaded region
Answer: Solid line y=2x−1y = 2x - 1 with the half-plane below it shaded

Step 1: Boundary: 3x+2y=63x + 2y = 6. Intercepts are (2,0)(2, 0) and (0,3)(0, 3)
Step 2: The sign is strict >>, so draw the line dashed
Step 3: Test (0,0)(0, 0): is 3(0)+2(0)=0>63(0) + 2(0) = 0 > 6? No
Step 4: Shade the side away from the origin
Step 5: Confirm with (4,0)(4, 0): 3(4)+2(0)=12>63(4) + 2(0) = 12 > 6 ✓
Answer: Dashed line through (2,0)(2,0) and (0,3)(0,3), shaded on the far side from the origin

Step 1: Subtract 11 from all three parts: −3<3x≤9-3 < 3x \le 9
Step 2: Divide all three parts by 33 (positive, so no flip): −1<x≤3-1 < x \le 3
Step 3: Draw an open circle at −1-1 and a filled circle at 33, shading between them
Step 4: Check the endpoints: at x=3x = 3, 3(3)+1=10≤103(3) + 1 = 10 \le 10 ✓ included; at x=−1x = -1, 3(−1)+1=−23(-1) + 1 = -2, which is not greater than −2-2, so it is correctly excluded
Answer: −1<x≤3-1 < x \le 3, or (−1,3](-1, 3]

Frequently Asked Questions

Dashed for the strict signs < and >, because points on the line do not satisfy the inequality. Solid for ≤ and ≥, because they do. It is the graphical version of choosing parentheses versus brackets in interval notation.

Pick any test point that is not on the boundary — (0,0) if the line does not pass through it — and substitute it into the original inequality. If the statement is true, shade the side containing that point; if false, shade the other side.

Graph each one separately with its own boundary style and shading, then keep only the region where the shadings overlap. That intersection is the solution set; points in just one shaded region satisfy only one of the constraints.

Almost always because the inequality sign was not flipped when both sides were multiplied or divided by a negative number. Using a test point on the original, unmanipulated inequality avoids the problem entirely.

Related Solvers

Related Guides

Try AI-Math for Free

Get step-by-step solutions to any math problem. Upload a photo or type your question.

Start Solving