Evaluate
Recognise the expression as a fractional part. For any real , is the fractional part , which always satisfies . So the whole expression is and is trapped in — bounded, but boundedness alone never proves a limit exists.
See what the inner function does. As , . The fractional part of a quantity racing to infinity sweeps through over and over, once per unit increase — and increases without bound, so it makes infinitely many such sweeps in any interval .
Build a sequence on which the value is always 0. Take for integer . Then is an integer, so
and .
Build a second sequence on which the value is always 1/2. Take . Then , whose floor is , so
and as well.
Conclude by the sequential criterion. If the limit existed and equalled , every sequence approaching would force the values to . Two sequences give and , so no such exists:
In fact by choosing for any the value can be made exactly , so every number in is a subsequential limit.
Need to solve a different problem like this? Open the solver →