Evaluate
or show that it does not exist.
Check the form and factor the numerator. Substituting gives , an indeterminate form. Factoring the numerator:
so the expression becomes . The factor appears above and, in absolute value, below — that is the signal that a one-sided analysis is required.
Understand why the absolute value forbids a single cancellation. For , equals when and when . Here changes sign exactly at the limit point, so the quotient jumps between and no matter how close to you look. The two sides must be treated separately.
Compute the left-hand limit. For we have , so and
So .
Compute the right-hand limit. For we have , so and
So .
Conclude and sanity-check numerically. Since , the one-sided limits disagree and the two-sided limit does not exist. Numerically, at the quotient is and at it is ✓ — the graph has a jump of height at . Had the denominator been instead of , the limit would have existed and equalled .
Need to solve a different problem like this? Open the solver →