Voltage in Parallel Calculator
Parallel branch currents, cable resistance and voltage drop, step by step
Voltage Is Common, Current Divides
Two components are in parallel when both ends connect to the same pair of nodes. That is why the defining rule of a parallel circuit is about voltage:
Symbols and units: in volts (V), in amperes (A), in ohms (Ω).
Each branch current is found independently from Ohm's law, , and the equivalent resistance comes from summing conductances:
The result is always smaller than the smallest branch, because adding a path can only make it easier for current to flow.
The operating assumption: an ideal source that holds its voltage regardless of load, and wiring with no resistance of its own. Section two removes that second assumption, which is where most real-world errors live.
The mistake people make: adding parallel resistances. Adding is the series rule.
Real Cable Has Resistance
Once the wiring itself is included, the branches no longer share exactly the same voltage — the cable steals some of it. A conductor's resistance is
with in ohm-metres (copper is Ω·m at 20 °C), the conductor length in metres and the cross-sectional area in square metres. Note that mm² m².
For a two-core supply the current travels out and back, so the loop length is twice the route length:
The loop resistance also sets the prospective fault current, , where adds the supply's own impedance to the cable's.
These are teaching calculations. Conductor size, permissible voltage drop and disconnection time for a real installation are set by the applicable wiring code — the NEC, BS 7671 or the local equivalent — using its own tables, correction factors and design current. Never install to an arithmetic result alone.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- Adding resistances in parallel — sum the reciprocals, then invert the sum once at the end.
- Using the one-way length for a cable run — the current goes and returns, so a m route is m of conductor.
- Assuming every parallel branch really sees the source voltage — with long cable runs it does not, and the far branch is starved.
- Leaving the cross-section in mm² — mm² is m² in an SI formula.
- Using the 20 °C resistivity for a hot conductor — a cable at °C has roughly more resistance, which is precisely the condition voltage-drop checks care about.
- Ignoring the source impedance in a fault calculation — the transformer and the service cable are part of the loop.
- Confusing conductor cross-section with cable diameter — the overall sheath is much larger than the copper inside it.
示例题目
常见问题
Yes, provided the connecting wiring has negligible resistance. Both ends of every branch meet at the same two nodes, so each branch sees the same potential difference. What differs is the current, which is largest in the smallest resistor.
Use R = rho L / A, with the resistivity in ohm-metres, the conductor length in metres and the cross-sectional area in square metres. For a two-core supply cable, use twice the route length because the current returns along the second core.
Find the loop resistance from R = rho L / A with the doubled length, then multiply by the design current: deltaV = IR. Compare it against the limit in the applicable wiring code, and correct the resistivity for the conductor's actual operating temperature.
Because each extra branch gives current another route. Conductances add, so the total conductance is larger than any one branch and its reciprocal, the resistance, is therefore smaller than any single branch.
相关求解器
免费试用 AI-Math
任何数学问题都能获得分步解答。拍照上传或输入问题即可。
开始解题