Calculus · real student question

At what values of x is f(x) = (x^2 - 1)/(x^2 - 3x + 2) discontinuous? Classify each discontinuity as removable or non-removable and justify the answer.

Question

At what values of xx is

f(x)=x21x23x+2f(x)=\frac{x^2-1}{x^2-3x+2}

discontinuous? Classify each discontinuity as removable or non-removable, and justify your answer.

Step-by-step solution

  1. Locate the suspects: the zeros of the denominator. A rational function is continuous everywhere its denominator is nonzero, so the only possible trouble spots come from

    x23x+2=(x1)(x2)=0  x=1, x=2.x^2-3x+2=(x-1)(x-2)=0\ \Longrightarrow\ x=1,\ x=2.

  2. Factor the numerator too - that is what decides the classification. Since x21=(x1)(x+1)x^2-1=(x-1)(x+1),

    f(x)=(x1)(x+1)(x1)(x2).f(x)=\frac{(x-1)(x+1)}{(x-1)(x-2)}.

    A discontinuity is removable exactly when the offending factor cancels, because then the two-sided limit exists and only the function value is missing.

  3. Handle x=1x=1: the factor cancels, so the limit exists. For x1x\neq 1 the function equals x+1x2\dfrac{x+1}{x-2}, hence

    limx1f(x)=1+112=2,\lim_{x\to 1}f(x)=\frac{1+1}{1-2}=-2,

    while f(1)f(1) is undefined. The limit exists but does not equal the (missing) value, so x=1x=1 is a removable discontinuity - a hole at (1,2)(1,-2). Redefining f(1)=2f(1)=-2 would patch it.

  4. Handle x=2x=2: the factor survives. Near x=2x=2 the reduced form is x+1x2\dfrac{x+1}{x-2} with numerator approaching 303\neq 0 and denominator approaching 00, so

    limx2f(x)=,limx2+f(x)=+.\lim_{x\to 2^-}f(x)=-\infty,\qquad \lim_{x\to 2^+}f(x)=+\infty.

    Numerically, f(1.999999)3×106f(1.999999)\approx -3\times 10^{6} and f(2.000001)3×106f(2.000001)\approx 3\times 10^{6}. No finite limit exists, so no redefinition can fix it: x=2x=2 is non-removable (an infinite discontinuity with a vertical asymptote).

  5. State the conclusion with justification. ff is discontinuous only at x=1x=1 and x=2x=2; x=1x=1 is removable because the common factor x1x-1 cancels and the limit 2-2 exists, and x=2x=2 is non-removable because the one-sided limits are infinite and of opposite sign.

Answer

x=1 removable (hole at (1,2));x=2 non-removable (vertical asymptote)x=1\ \text{removable (hole at }(1,-2)\text{)};\qquad x=2\ \text{non-removable (vertical asymptote)}

Need to solve a different problem like this? Open the solver →