Evaluate
Substitute first to identify the indeterminate form. Always check before applying any technique:
So the expression is of the form . This is good news, not bad: it guarantees that the factor hides in both the top and the bottom and can be cancelled. Note also that sits comfortably inside the domain, since and near .
Split the numerator so each square root loses its own value. The constant is exactly , i.e. the sum of the two radicals evaluated at . Rewriting it that way lets each radical be handled separately:
This is the key move. Trying to rationalise the three-term numerator in one go creates a mess; splitting it turns one hard limit into two easy conjugate problems.
Rationalise each piece with its conjugate. Multiplying by turns the difference of square roots into a difference of squares:
Both pieces now carry an explicit factor of — the very factor that also lives in the denominator.
Cancel the common factor . Factor the denominator as a difference of squares, , and combine:
Cancelling is legal because the limit only cares about .
Substitute into the cancelled expression. Nothing is indeterminate any more:
Cross-check with L'Hopital's rule. Because the form was , differentiating top and bottom separately is also valid:
Both routes agree. A numerical spot check confirms it too: at the quotient is , and .
Need to solve a different problem like this? Open the solver →