Is it true that
for an arithmetic sequence with common difference ? Prove it, and state when the identity fails.
Recall the general term. An arithmetic sequence with first term and common difference has
This is the closed form; the claim to be proved is the recursive form hiding inside it.
Write the previous term by replacing with .
The restriction matters — there is no in a sequence indexed from .
Subtract the two expressions. The terms cancel and the -coefficients differ by exactly one:
So yes, the identity holds for every , and the answer does not depend on — the gap is the same everywhere in the sequence.
Generalise to non-adjacent terms. The same subtraction with arbitrary indices gives
with being the special case , .
Check on a concrete sequence. With and : , , . Then ✓ and ✓.
State the converse and the failure case. The identity is not just a consequence of being arithmetic — it characterises it: if equals the same constant for all , the sequence is arithmetic. For a general sequence the difference need not be constant at all; e.g. for it is , which changes with . So the formula may only be used once the sequence is known to be arithmetic.
Need to solve a different problem like this? Open the solver →