Algebra · real student question

Solve the inequality 1 + 11/(2 to the x, minus 8) + 28/(4 to the x, minus 2 to the (x+4), plus 64) ≥ 0.

Question

Solve

1+112x8+284x2x+4+6401 + \frac{11}{2^{x} - 8} + \frac{28}{4^{x} - 2^{x+4} + 64} \ge 0

Step-by-step solution

  1. Substitute t = 2ˣ and rewrite every exponential in terms of t. Since 2x>02^x > 0 for all real xx, set t=2xt = 2^x with t>0t > 0. Then

    4x=(2x)2=t2,2x+4=242x=16t4^x = (2^x)^2 = t^2, \qquad 2^{x+4} = 2^4 \cdot 2^x = 16t

    The key rewrite is 2x+4=16t2^{x+4} = 16t, not t+16t + 16 — the exponent adds, so the base multiplies.

  2. Recognise the second denominator as a perfect square.

    4x2x+4+64=t216t+64=(t8)24^x - 2^{x+4} + 64 = t^2 - 16t + 64 = (t - 8)^2

    Both denominators now involve the same quantity t8t - 8, which is what makes the whole problem collapse. Write u=t8u = t - 8, so the inequality becomes

    1+11u+28u20,u01 + \frac{11}{u} + \frac{28}{u^2} \ge 0, \qquad u \ne 0

  3. Multiply through by u² — legitimate because it is positive. Since u0u \ne 0, u2>0u^2 > 0, so multiplying does not flip the inequality:

    u2+11u+280  (u+4)(u+7)0u^2 + 11u + 28 \ge 0 \ \Longleftrightarrow \ (u + 4)(u + 7) \ge 0

    This is why writing the denominators as a square and its root pays off: no sign chart on the fractions is needed.

  4. Solve the quadratic inequality in u. An upward parabola is non-negative outside its roots u=7u = -7 and u=4u = -4:

    u7oru4,u0u \le -7 \quad \text{or} \quad u \ge -4, \qquad u \ne 0

  5. Translate back through u = t − 8 and t = 2ˣ. From u7u \le -7:

    t1  2x20  x0t \le 1 \ \Rightarrow \ 2^x \le 2^0 \ \Rightarrow \ x \le 0

    From u4u \ge -4:

    t4  2x22  x2t \ge 4 \ \Rightarrow \ 2^x \ge 2^2 \ \Rightarrow \ x \ge 2

    Both use the fact that 2x2^x is increasing, so the direction of the inequality is preserved. The condition t>0t > 0 is automatic and imposes nothing extra.

  6. Remove the excluded point and state the answer. The restriction u0u \ne 0 means t8t \ne 8, i.e. x3x \ne 3, where both original denominators vanish. So

    x(,0][2,3)(3,)x \in (-\infty, 0] \cup [2, 3) \cup (3, \infty)

    Numerical spot checks confirm it: at x=1x = -1 the left side is +0.0311+0.0311, at x=0x = 0 it is exactly 00, at x=1x = 1 it is 0.0556-0.0556, at x=2x = 2 it is exactly 00, and at x=4x = 4 it is +2.8125+2.8125.

Answer

x(,0][2,3)(3,)x \in (-\infty, 0] \cup [2, 3) \cup (3, \infty)

Need to solve a different problem like this? Open the solver →