Let , and . Find the minimum value of
Reduce to one variable and pin down the domain. The constraint gives , and forces
On that interval and , so both denominators stay positive and is continuous. Substituting,
Differentiate each piece separately. For the first term, the quotient rule gives a numerator , so
For the second, the numerator is , so
The first term is increasing and the second is decreasing, which is exactly why an interior minimum exists.
Set the derivative to zero and solve.
On both and are positive, so take positive square roots:
(the last step multiplies top and bottom by , using ). Then , so the critical point is admissible.
Evaluate each term in exact form. With ,
and with ,
Add them and confirm it is the minimum.
Compare the endpoints of the open interval: as , ; as , . Both exceed , so the interior critical point is the global minimum.
Watch out for two tempting wrong answers. Plugging in the symmetric-looking gives , which is close but not minimal — does not satisfy the weighted constraint in a balanced way. And the value is impossible here, since and the endpoint limits already bound below only near . The exact minimum is .
Need to solve a different problem like this? Open the solver →