A survey of 1438 multigenerational households is broken down by race and by household type. The Black row shows 114 two-adult-generation, 34 skip-generation, and 102 three-or-more-generation families, for a row total of 250. What is the probability that a randomly selected Black multigenerational family is a two-adult-generation family? Round to three decimal places.
Question
A survey of 1438 multigenerational households is cross-classified by race and by household type:
2 Adult Gens
2 Skip Gens
3 or More Gens
Total
White
507
53
226
786
Hispanic
141
5
146
292
Black
114
34
102
250
Asian
66
7
37
110
Total
828
99
511
1438
What is the probability that a randomly selected Black multigenerational family is a two-adult-generation family? Round to three decimal places.
Step-by-step solution
1
Read what the conditioning word does. The phrase "a randomly selected Black multigenerational family" tells you the selection is already known to come from the Black row. That is a conditional probability P(2 adult gens∣Black), and the single most common mistake here is dividing by the grand total 1438 instead of by the row total.
2
Shrink the sample space to the given row. Once you know the family is Black, the only outcomes still possible are the 250 Black households. This row total is the new denominator:
P(A∣B)=n(B)n(A and B)
3
Count the favourable outcomes inside that row. The cell where the Black row meets the "2 Adult Gens" column holds 114 households, so n(A and B)=114.
4
Divide and round.
P(2 adult gens∣Black)=250114=0.456
The division is exact, so no rounding error is introduced: 250114=12557.
0.456
5
Sanity-check against the unconditional probability. If you had wrongly used the grand total you would get 114/1438≈0.079, a very different number. Also note the three conditional probabilities down the Black row must sum to 1: 250114+25034+250102=250250=1, which confirms the row total was read correctly.