Five squares of side cm are joined edge to edge (each square must line up exactly with its neighbours). Build two shapes whose perimeters are not equal, and find the perimeter of each.
See why the area cannot decide the perimeter. Every arrangement uses the same five squares, so every shape has area . Perimeter, however, depends on how the squares touch — this is the point of the exercise: equal area does not force equal perimeter.
Derive the counting rule. Five separate squares would expose unit edges. Every time two squares are joined, one edge of each is hidden, removing from the total:
So the shape with fewer internal contacts has the larger perimeter.
Shape 1 — a straight row of five squares. Laid in a line, each square touches only its immediate neighbours, giving shared edges:
Checking directly: the row is cm by cm, so cm.
Shape 2 — three squares in a row with two stacked on top. Take cells at on the bottom and on top. The contacts are , , , and — five shared edges:
Confirm shape 2 by walking its boundary. Starting at the bottom-left corner and going clockwise: up , right , down , right , down , left . That is cm, matching the formula.
State the answer and the underlying principle.
An L-shape of five squares (three across, two up one side) also has only shared edges, so it gives cm — the same as the row. Compactness, not visual "bendiness", is what lowers the perimeter.
Need to solve a different problem like this? Open the solver →