Calculus · real student question

Change the order of integration to evaluate the triple integral of dz dy dx with z from 0 to 3 - 3x - y, y from 0 to 3(1 - x), and x from 0 to 1, integrating first with respect to y, then x, then z.

Question

Change the order of integration to evaluate the triple integral

x=01y=03(1x)z=03xy+3dzdydx\int_{x=0}^{1}\int_{y=0}^{3(1-x)}\int_{z=0}^{-3x-y+3}dz\,dy\,dx

by integrating first with respect to yy, then xx, then zz. Enter an exact answer.

Step-by-step solution

  1. Describe the solid by inequalities instead of by limits. Reading the three limits from the inside out:

    0z33xy,0y33x,0x1.0\le z\le 3-3x-y,\qquad 0\le y\le 3-3x,\qquad 0\le x\le 1.

    All three collapse into the single symmetric description

    x0,y0,z0,3x+y+z3,x\ge 0,\quad y\ge 0,\quad z\ge 0,\quad 3x+y+z\le 3,

    which is a tetrahedron with vertices (0,0,0)(0,0,0), (1,0,0)(1,0,0), (0,3,0)(0,3,0) and (0,0,3)(0,0,3).

  2. Choose the outermost variable for the new order. The requested order is dydxdzdy\,dx\,dz, so zz is outermost. Projecting the tetrahedron onto the zz-axis gives 0z30\le z\le 3.

  3. Fix z and find the range of x. With zz held, the slice is {3x+y3z, x,y0}\{3x+y\le 3-z,\ x,y\ge 0\}. Setting y=0y=0 gives the widest xx:

    0x3z3.0\le x\le \frac{3-z}{3}.

  4. Fix z and x, then read off y. From 3x+y3z3x+y\le 3-z,

    0y3z3x,0\le y\le 3-z-3x,

    so the reordered integral is

    z=03x=0(3z)/3y=03z3xdydxdz.\int_{z=0}^{3}\int_{x=0}^{(3-z)/3}\int_{y=0}^{3-z-3x}dy\,dx\,dz.

  5. Evaluate from the inside out. The inner integral gives 3z3x3-z-3x. Then

    0(3z)/3(3z3x)dx=[(3z)x3x22]0(3z)/3=(3z)23(3z)26=(3z)26.\int_{0}^{(3-z)/3}\left(3-z-3x\right)dx=\left[(3-z)x-\tfrac{3x^{2}}{2}\right]_{0}^{(3-z)/3}=\frac{(3-z)^{2}}{3}-\frac{(3-z)^{2}}{6}=\frac{(3-z)^{2}}{6}.

    Finally

    03(3z)26dz=16273=2718=32.\int_{0}^{3}\frac{(3-z)^{2}}{6}\,dz=\frac{1}{6}\cdot\frac{27}{3}=\frac{27}{18}=\frac{3}{2}.

  6. Check geometrically. The integrand is 11, so the answer is just the volume of a tetrahedron with mutually perpendicular legs 11, 33 and 33:

    V=16(1)(3)(3)=32.V=\frac{1}{6}(1)(3)(3)=\frac{3}{2}.

    The two routes agree, confirming the reordering was done correctly.

Answer

32\frac{3}{2}

Need to solve a different problem like this? Open the solver →