Let be the function defined on by
Split the fraction instead of fighting the indeterminate form. Written as it stands, is an form. Dividing each term of the numerator by the denominator removes the ambiguity outright:
This rewriting is legitimate for every , where .
Read off the first limit. As we have , so and
The line is a horizontal asymptote of the graph, approached from above since always.
Do not substitute into the outer function. For the inner value does not go to infinity — it goes to . The correct tool is the composition rule for limits: if as , and is continuous at , then
Check that the rule applies. Here , which lies inside the domain , and is continuous there (it is built from and a quotient whose denominator never vanishes on that interval). Moreover for every , so the inner values genuinely stay inside the domain of the outer — the composition is well defined near infinity.
Evaluate the outer function at . Since :
Confirm numerically. At : and . At : and . The values close in on and , exactly as the continuity argument predicts.
Need to solve a different problem like this? Open the solver →