Evaluate
Notice why this one is doable at all. The closely related has no elementary antiderivative. The extra factor of changes everything: it is (up to a constant) the derivative of the exponent, so the integral is a pure substitution. Recognising that distinction is the entire insight.
Choose the substitution. Let
Rewrite the integral entirely in . The in the original is replaced wholesale, leaving nothing in behind:
Integrate and substitute back.
Differentiate to check. By the chain rule,
which is the original integrand ✓. A numerical spot check at : the symmetric difference quotient of gives , and ✓.
Note what a definite version would give. With limits to the answer is ; in particular .
Need to solve a different problem like this? Open the solver →