Calculus · real student question

Determine, for each a > 0, whether the series sum from n = 2 to infinity of ln(1 + (-1)^n / n^a) converges absolutely, converges conditionally, or diverges.

Question

For α>0\alpha>0, decide whether

n=2ln ⁣(1+(1)nnα)\sum_{n=2}^{\infty}\ln\!\left(1+\frac{(-1)^n}{n^{\alpha}}\right)

converges absolutely, converges conditionally, or diverges.

Step-by-step solution

  1. Do not test the alternating part alone. The terms look alternating, and Leibniz's test tempts you immediately. But ln(1+x)\ln(1+x) is not an odd function: ln(1+t)\ln(1+t) and ln(1t)\ln(1-t) do not cancel, and the leftover bias is what actually decides this problem. So expand instead of testing.

  2. Expand the logarithm. With xn=(1)nnα0x_n=(-1)^n n^{-\alpha}\to 0 and ln(1+x)=xx22+O(x3)\ln(1+x)=x-\tfrac{x^2}{2}+O(x^3),

    ln ⁣(1+(1)nnα)=(1)nnαalternating12n2αalways negative+O ⁣(1n3α)\ln\!\left(1+\frac{(-1)^n}{n^{\alpha}}\right)=\underbrace{\frac{(-1)^n}{n^{\alpha}}}_{\text{alternating}}-\underbrace{\frac{1}{2n^{2\alpha}}}_{\text{always negative}}+O\!\left(\frac{1}{n^{3\alpha}}\right)

    The second term has no sign change at all — that is the hidden bias.

  3. Handle the alternating piece. (1)nnα\sum (-1)^n n^{-\alpha} converges for every α>0\alpha>0 by Leibniz (the terms decrease monotonically to zero), and converges absolutely exactly when α>1\alpha>1. So this piece never causes divergence.

  4. Handle the quadratic piece — this is the decider. 12n2α\sum \tfrac{1}{2}n^{-2\alpha} is a pp-series with p=2αp=2\alpha; it converges iff 2α>12\alpha>1, i.e. α>12\alpha>\tfrac12. When α12\alpha\le\tfrac12 this piece diverges to -\infty while the alternating piece stays bounded, so the whole series diverges.

  5. Assemble the three regimes. The O(n3α)O(n^{-3\alpha}) remainder is dominated by the n2αn^{-2\alpha} term, so it never changes the verdict:

    • α>1\alpha>1: both pieces converge absolutely, since ln(1+(1)nnα)nα\left|\ln\left(1+\tfrac{(-1)^n}{n^\alpha}\right)\right|\sim n^{-\alpha} and nα\sum n^{-\alpha} converges.
    • 12<α1\tfrac12<\alpha\le 1: the series converges, but ln()nα\left|\ln(\cdot)\right|\sim n^{-\alpha} with α1\alpha\le 1 makes \sum|\cdot| diverge — conditional convergence.
    • 0<α120<\alpha\le\tfrac12: divergent.
  6. State the result.

    n=2ln ⁣(1+(1)nnα)={absolutely convergent,α>1conditionally convergent,12<α1divergent,0<α12\sum_{n=2}^{\infty}\ln\!\left(1+\frac{(-1)^n}{n^{\alpha}}\right)=\begin{cases}\text{absolutely convergent}, & \alpha>1\\[2pt]\text{conditionally convergent}, & \tfrac12<\alpha\le 1\\[2pt]\text{divergent}, & 0<\alpha\le\tfrac12\end{cases}

    The moral: for ln(1+an)\ln(1+a_n) with alternating ana_n, always expand to second order before applying an alternating-series test.

Answer

absolutely convergent for α>1;conditionally convergent for 12<α1;divergent for 0<α12\text{absolutely convergent for }\alpha>1;\quad\text{conditionally convergent for }\tfrac12<\alpha\le 1;\quad\text{divergent for }0<\alpha\le\tfrac12

Need to solve a different problem like this? Open the solver →