Let be the universal set and let . Which of the following statements is correct?
Convert every difference into an intersection with a complement. The single rule turns all four statements into pure intersection/union/complement algebra, where De Morgan's laws can be applied mechanically. Guessing from Venn pictures is error-prone; this rewriting is not.
Test statement 1. Left side: . Right side: . These differ — an element of lying in but not in belongs to the right side but not the left. False. (The correct version is .)
Test statement 2. Left side: . Right side: , using idempotence . The two sides are identical. True.
Test statement 3. Left side: . The claimed right side is . Take : then is in the left side (since ) but not the right (since and ). False.
Test statement 4. Left side: . Right side: . Any is in the right side but not the left, because the left removes all of including the part inside . False.
Conclude.
A concrete counterexample settles all three false ones at once: take , , , . Then statement 1 reads , statement 3 reads and statement 4 reads — all false — while statement 2 reads .
Need to solve a different problem like this? Open the solver →