Which of the following conclusions is correct?
A. For , the minimum of is .
B. For , the minimum of is .
C. For , .
D. For , the minimum of is .
Recall the three conditions AM–GM needs. For to give a genuine minimum, the terms must be positive, their product must be constant, and the equality point must actually lie in the allowed domain. Each wrong option below fails exactly one of these.
A fails: the bound is not a constant. AM–GM gives , but still depends on , so it is not a minimum value — it is a moving target. (The true minimum is at , i.e. .) Incorrect.
B fails: equality is excluded by the domain. with equality only at , and the domain is . On the function is strictly increasing, so it takes values but never reaches : the infimum is and there is no minimum. Incorrect.
C is correct. Put ; then , with equality at , i.e. , which is in the domain . So the inequality holds for all and is sharp. Correct.
D fails: 1 is a maximum, not a minimum. Write ; since , . Then , so
For , , hence . So is the largest value of (attained at , i.e. ), not the smallest. Incorrect.
Conclude.
Spot checks: for D, gives , and gives , confirming that is a maximum. For B, gives , and the value decreases toward but never reaches it.
Need to solve a different problem like this? Open the solver →