Solve the compound inequality
Read what the statement says. Three parts means two inequalities at once: is greater than and less than . Both bounds are smaller than the already attached to , so itself must be negative — a useful prediction.
Check the statement is consistent. The lower bound is less than the upper bound , so the target window is non-empty and a solution exists. (Had they been reversed, as in , the answer would be the empty set.)
Subtract 4 from all three parts. Subtracting the same number from each part never changes either direction — no flipping, no case analysis:
Simplify.
Both bounds are negative, exactly as predicted in step 1, and the interval has width — the same width as the original window, since shifting does not stretch.
Verify both endpoints and an interior point. At : , which fails the strict lower bound, so is correctly excluded. At : , failing the strict upper bound, so excluded too. At (inside): , and ✓. Checking sample values confirms the solution set is exactly the open interval ✓.
Need to solve a different problem like this? Open the solver →