Given that , find the largest for which
holds for all admissible and .
Reduce to one variable using the constraint. From we get , so the expression becomes a function of alone:
The rewrite is what exposes the two separate poles.
Record the domain. Both denominators must be non-zero:
So the domain is — and the excluded point is exactly where the trouble will be.
Examine the behaviour near the pole x = 1/3. As we have , hence
The first term blows up and the rest stays bounded, so .
Confirm with explicit values. Taking closer and closer to from below:
Every target value is exceeded, so the expression has no upper bound. (The same happens as , where is not the case — there — but one divergent direction is enough.)
Conclude that no largest m exists. For to hold for all admissible , we would need . No real number satisfies that, so:
If the intended problem carried extra sign restrictions such as , note that the pole at still lies inside that region, so the expression is unbounded there too and the conclusion is unchanged.
Need to solve a different problem like this? Open the solver →