Solve the inequality
where is a parameter. Discuss all cases.
Factor first — it is much cleaner than the quadratic formula. Try and expand:
so the inequality is
The roots are therefore — fixed, independent of — and when .
Handle the degenerate case a = 0 first. With the term vanishes and the inequality is linear:
Case a > 0: upward parabola, roots in a fixed order. Since , , so the movable root is always to the left of . An upward parabola is negative between its roots:
Realise that a < 0 must be split further — this is where most solutions go wrong. For , is positive, and how it compares with depends on the size of :
For instance gives , but gives . Claiming for all negative is simply false.
Case -1 < a < 0. The parabola opens downward and the roots are ordered . A downward parabola is negative outside its roots:
Case a < -1, and the boundary a = -1. For the roots swap order to , so "outside the roots" now reads
At exactly the two roots merge: , which is negative for every except , where it is zero. So the solution there is , i.e. .
Verify the whole case table numerically. Testing values of from to in steps of , and exact rational values of on for each, the five-case description above matches the actual sign of at every single point — zero mismatches ✓. The three-case version fails immediately, e.g. at , , where it predicts negative but the value is .
Need to solve a different problem like this? Open the solver →