Solve the chained inequality
and write the solution set as an interval.
Split the chain into two separate inequalities. A statement of the form is shorthand for two conditions that must hold at the same time:
The final answer is the intersection of the two solution sets, not their union. It is tempting to jump straight to comparing the outer expressions and , but that would be a weaker condition and would produce a wrong (too large) answer set.
Expand both sides of (I) and watch the quadratic terms cancel. Multiplying out,
Both sides have exactly the same leading term , so subtracting from both sides is legal and leaves a linear inequality:
This cancellation is the whole point of the problem: because consecutive shifted products all have leading coefficient , no sign chart or parabola analysis is needed.
Solve the linear inequality (I). Collect the 's on one side:
Dividing by the positive number does not flip the inequality sign; the direction only flips when you divide or multiply by a negative number. Reading from right to left gives .
Do the same with (II). Expanding,
Intersect the two conditions. We need and simultaneously. Since lies to the left of , the second condition is the stricter one and it automatically implies the first:
Test one value inside and one value outside. At : , , , and holds. ✓ At (which satisfies (I) but not (II)): , , , and is false. ✗ This confirms that intersecting rather than unioning was the right move, and that the endpoint is included because both inequalities allow equality.
Need to solve a different problem like this? Open the solver →